Parenthesis question

[outsource]

While what you have is certainly acceptable to the compiler, I would recommend you use the appropriate relational operator to perform the desired comparison.

Why? Because this code,

&& (zapped[0] != 0)

is easier to read than this code,

&&!(zapped[0] == 0)

See here for some examples:
http://www.tutorialspoint.com/csharp..._operators.htm

I don`t think this code will work out

&& (zapped[0] != 0)

I think,on the contrary, it would fire every 'zapped' it spots

[koganam]

I don`t think this code will work out

&& (zapped[0] != 0)

I think,on the contrary, it would fire every 'zapped' it spots

It is not a matter of opinion, as to whether it is correct: that is a matter of code. As to which is clearer, that may be a matter of opinion, but in most coders opinions that I know of, despite their equivalence, "not (zapped[0] equal to zero)" makes less lexical sense than "zapped[0] is not equal to 0".

[outsource]

Ok,i undestand.Thanks,guys!So i guess there is no need for parenthesis for zapped then