I have, more or less, recreated it in NT8, it compiles, and the strategy testing tool will run it.
I run the exact same strategy with the only changes being whether it takes a long or short position at the end of its logic and both show massive losses.
Snapshots are (IIRC) ES MAR24, 1min, 1:1 Risk:Reward (4ticks), on close of bar, 1 tick slippage, standard resolution (not fine).
This behavior, massive losses in both directions and occurs even when changing the R:R, number of ticks, with 0 or 1 slippage, and with lower time frames (10s lowest which I attempted to get more granularity).
I am assuming this behavior has to do with being unable to run it in "fine" mode as it has multiple time series and/or encountering bars which encompass both the TP and SL?
Is there something I may be missing? Would this need to be tested live using a demo account?
Perhaps my thinking it too simplistic but if I had more losses than wins with a short and 1:1 R:R then reversing it to a long should result in more wins than losses. Assuming the same entries (which should be the case).
Thank you.

Comment