Found Two processes mentioned elsewhere. One related to intrabar fill granularity and two series in same script; the other related to calling an ATM script with the alternate contract.
Between these two concepts (or a different one) which might be the most straight forward / robust path to 'running my strategy on the Mini, but executing on the Micro?'
-Currently I run the strategy on both contracts separately (one live, one sim), and correct positions manually when they get out of sync. The larger contract I consider more reliable for signal generation(primary)... This seems unnecessarily stressful, eh.
The two semi relevant posts I mentioned were:
1- https://ninjatrader.com/support/help...ipt_strate.htm
2- https://ninjatrader.com/support/foru...ry-data-series
Let me know if I need to clarify further, I appreciate your guidance!
hmm(I suppose the issue with this Is id lose accountability for the actual micro position)
-Sorry, additional thoughts... Part of strategy involves actual position PL. as input on whether to take next signal. So maybe? Run strategy in sim account but somehow mimic position in an ATM? ---rabbit hole, there are targets and stop.

Comment