colocacion de ordenes limitadas extrañas

[juliangonzaconde]

I made the same modifications as you in the sample script, the only change I made was also printing the difference between the previous and current volume, nothing that could affect the logic of the indicator. It’s just to make the output clearer, and I checked the increments/decrements of 100, 150, and 250 again. In fact, I just reviewed your video and you also see a 150 increment, which is exactly what I mentioned is happening.

Here’s the output of the script, please take a look at how, after just a few ticks from the crossing price, there are increments and decrements of 100, 150, and 250 that keep moving:
, NinjaScript Output 05_09_2024 19_42.txt . And to clear up any doubts, I’m also sending you the exported indicator: SampleLevel2Book.zip , If the output isn’t clear, try it yourself with the exported indicator and carefully look for those 3 numbers that repeat. Of course, there’s normal volume as well, but it’s very strange that it’s always those 3 numbers that stay distant from the crossing price (look at the images from the beginning of this post). In fact, in your own output from the Drive video, you could have noticed this, but since you didn’t print the difference, it wasn’t clear to you.

[NinjaTrader_ChelseaB]

Hello juliangonzaconde,

The changes you made may be causing the issue.

Please provide the output from the test script I have provided you without making any modifications to it.

[juliangonzaconde]

Hello juliangonzaconde,

The changes you made may be causing the issue.

Please provide the output from the test script I have provided you without making any modifications to it.

For God's sake, it's impossible for us to resolve anything. Aren't you making an effort to read what I'm saying? This is the third time you've blamed the problems on my code changes. I've sent you the code as well and explained that the only thing I've added is a subtraction. Are you seriously going to tell me that the problem is with the subtraction? Is it easier to say the issue is with my code instead of reading it and understanding it? Can someone else respond to me instead of you? I really don't think I can explain it any better or in any other way. Either you properly review the code, or we leave this unresolved. I'm tired of going in circles.

[juliangonzaconde]

In the video you shared with me on Drive, you were reading the previous and current volumes and doing the subtraction in your head, and I, to make it clearer, have done that subtraction in the code and I’m printing it. And now you're telling me the problem might be coming from there? Sorry, but after all the screenshots I've been sending you, all the information and effort I'm putting into resolving this, I think it's understandable that I'm getting upset. There are a lot of screenshots since the start of the topic, and this isn't going to be solved by blaming a subtraction in the code. That’s definitely not the way.

[NinjaTrader_ChelseaB]

Hello juliangonzaconde,

Because I am not able to reproduce, the information I am requesting will help me see where the issue lies. As you are not performing the instructions I have provided, I am not getting the information I need to help diagnose.

I have read all of your posts, and this is how I know you are not following the directions I have provided.

I want to see snapshots of the ask and bid updates as they are, too if the data itself is where the issue.

Your modifications prevent this.

Unfortunately, as your unwilling to provide the requested information without modifying it, I not certain how to move forward with assisting.

Yes, I see your output is not as you expect. How would you like to proceeed?

[giogio1]

Hola juliangonzaconde, Is spoofing in your considerations? This might help you. Buenas suerte con tu trabajo. Gio

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4525036