The SuperDOM is a great tool for manual traders which makes order-handling very easy. It has only one flaw, which -on the other hand -makes it difficult to use it in faster markets:
You have two type of clicks for different entrytypes: middle-mouse for stops, and left-mouse for limits.
Since you can only put stops in advance the price, and limits behind it, it is hard to understand why NT has choosen the design that is used now.
Tradestation for example went for the easy solution: you can put on an order by left clicking only: if it is ahead of price, it is a stop order, if it is behind the price, it is a limit order. This way, you always get an order sent (that is a chance to be filled).
Whereas with NT if you middleclick between eg. bid and ask: you get an error window (which you have to click again to disappear) instead of an order on that level. So you need to know where the bid and ask is, and choose your clicking accordingly. If market was a bit faster than you were, you don't get another chance, although price usually goes back and forth on that same level. You cannot go for leftclicking only, because if you click ahead of price, you get filled instantly by a market order. This way I missed 3 trades today, which could have been filled if SuperDOM had been just a little more intelligent.
So sum it up: it would be great, that by clicking on a level in SuperDOM, an order ON THAT EXACT LEVEL would always be sent to the broker (either stoplimit/stopmarket or limit, which is kindof technical and irrelevant for the trader. The only thing that counts, is the clicked price level)
I don't know how many traders have come across this issue, but I guess there should be many of us, as NT is mostly used by low-margin futures brokers, who encourage fast trading.
I know it is a major design decision, but I needed to write about it and I hope someone hears me...

Thanks in advance

Comment