Suggestion: Allow session boundary vertical line control

[jdfagan]

Minor suggestion here as of beta 7 - allow us to control look of session boundary vertical line as was capable in 6.5. Plot vertical lines does not control this and even if it did, I would rather independently control it by making the width thicker and/or color different.

I believe this was controllable in 6.5 via "Session break lines".

JD

[NinjaTrader_JoshP]

JD,

This is controllable in the Data Series window. Scroll down a bit on the right hand side to find it.

[jdfagan]

Thanks Josh - missed that - makes sense!

[jdfagan]

Is there a way to make my changes to a DataSeries set of settings the default? I have to alter some settings all the time it seems like thickness of my session break line each time I build a new chart. Likewise for trade coloring if I ever chose to play with that, etc.

Perhaps if there was a "clone chart" feature where a new chart would be built from an existing one via right click -> clone so that it would have all those settings (basic chart properties and data series properties as well as its indicators, strategies, etc.) cloned - would be valuable capability.

JD

[terenyi]

Is there a way to make my changes to a DataSeries set of settings the default? I have to alter some settings all the time it seems like thickness of my session break line each time I build a new chart. Likewise for trade coloring if I ever chose to play with that, etc.

Perhaps if there was a "clone chart" feature where a new chart would be built from an existing one via right click -> clone so that it would have all those settings (basic chart properties and data series properties as well as its indicators, strategies, etc.) cloned - would be valuable capability.

JD

I second that.

[NinjaTrader_JoshP]

You should be able to just right click in the DataSeries window on the right hand side and select Set to Default.

[terenyi]

You should be able to just right click in the DataSeries window on the right hand side and select Set to Default.

Oh, we obviously missed that. Thanks for the hint!